Forensic Architecture / Goldsmiths, University of London
Stockholm University
Goldsmiths, University of London
Critical Media Lab Basel FHNW/ NSCAD, Halifax
Goldsmiths, University of London
University of New Mexico
Tel Aviv University
University of Pennsylvania
Hubbub / Max Planck Intitute for Human Cogntive and Brain Science
School of the Art Institute of Chicago
Ernest G. Welch School of Art and Design / Georgia State University
University of California, San Diego / Strelka Institute for Media, Architecture and Design, Moscow
Wits Insitute for Social and Economic Research
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Berlin
University of California Santa Cruz
Goldsmiths, University of London
University of Western Australia
University of Washington, Seattle
University of California, San Diego
Penn State University
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin
Ca’ Foscari University, Venice / Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin
University of Leuven
Stockholm Resilience Centre and Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Yale University
University of Vienna
King’s College London
HKW
Center for GeoHumanities, Royal Holloway, University of London
The Wilderness Society
Munich Re
Goldsmiths, University of London
University of Southern California and Aarhus University Research on the Anthropocene (AURA)
Resource Strategy, University of Augsburg
University of Illinois at Chicago / School of the Art Institute of Chicago
Potsdam University
Oxford Internet Institute and Alan Turing Institute, London
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva
Enviornmental Humanites Laboratory / Royal Institute of Technology
Concordia University, Montréal
University of Arizona, Tucson
Stanford University / Center for International Security and Cooperation
American University in Cairo
Delft University of Technology
Goldsmiths, University of London
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
University of Lüneburg / Digital Culture Research Lab
University of Georgia
Duke University, North Carolina
University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette
SOAS, University of London
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
University of Chicago
Drexel University
Drexel University, Philadelphia
Rathenau Instituut, The Hague
University of California, Berkeley
University of California, Los Angeles
Barnard College, Columbia University
Sciences Po, Paris
Arizona State University / Global Biosocial Complexity Initiative
Open University, Milton Keynes
Birkbeck, University of London
Columbia University, New York
Stanford University Humanities Center
University of Edinburgh
National Center for Scientific Research, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin
Indiana University, Bloomington
Stanford University / Program in Science, Technology, and Society
Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto
University of Colorado Boulder
Goldsmiths, University of London
MIT
Cornell University
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
Stockholm Environment Institute
University of Alberta
Balsillie School of International Affairs, Waterloo, Canada
University of Potsdam
Speculative Design Project
University of Augsburg
King's College London
Technical University of Berlin / Cluster of Excellence “Unifying Systems of Catalysis”
University of Lancaster
Chicago Center for Contemporary Theory, University of Chicago
University of Kansas
Global Studies Institute, Geneva University
Australian National University
University of Pennsylvania
anexact office and Massachusetts Institute of Technology
University of Cape Town
MIT
Leuphana University Lüneburg
Fridtjof Nansen Institute, Lysaker
Feminist Research Institute, University of California, Davis
Rice University, Houston
School of the Art Institute of Chicago
University of Leicester / Anthropocene Working Group
School of Sustainability, Arizona State University
Sámi University of Applied Sciences, Kautokeino
The idea of a sealed habitable sphere has and continues to inform how life itself is understood. Tracing the historical roots of the miniature modeling of regenerative life systems and ecologies, historian of science Sabine Höhler encapsulates the varied technoscientific motives and consequences of experimenting with self-contained ecospheres and how they relate to the concept of life on Earth.
As environments increasingly become computational so does computation become environmental. Tech-driven practices of environmental monitoring such as citizen-based air quality measurements and sensor networks generate material-political worlds through “creaturing data.” Jennifer Gabrys shows how the instrumentation of the planet with sensor devices produces specific forms of concretizations that have a life of their own and contour the earthly space anew.
Alternative projections of terrain and its technonatural reality are a powerful tool in fictionalizing the existent. In her work Spheres (2017), artist Rohini Devasher combines a concave curvature of sceneries with her drawings pulled from the history of geology, astronomy, and volcanology. With these, she envisions the space between landscape, recording technology, and their relationship to our planet.
Why does the world not come to a standstill? This question is positioned at the crest of the modern understanding of terrestrial cycles and spheres. In this article historian of science Pietro Daniel Omodeo unpacks the original, and thus, literal notion of the spheres—from their genuine context in ancient and early modern cosmology and metaphysical doctrine—and comments on the forfeiture of stability threatening today’s spheres.
Sociologist and epistemologist Bruno Latour interprets the disorienting situation we currently face along new lines of representation. Using the shift in cosmological perspective from the globe to the Earth brought about by the two concepts of Gaia and the Critical Zone, Latour reflects on the emergence of a new political subject: the “terrestrial.”
How did the current notion of “spheres” as an operational interface between living and inert matter come into being, and how did it go on to infiltrate thinking about the bio-techno-sphere, which today seems the best descriptive model for our own habitat? In this profound historical contextualization of the work and life of the eminent Russian naturalist Vladimir Vernadsky, historians of science Giulia Rispoli and Jacques Grinevald draw on the transformational role of concepts.
The idea of a sealed habitable sphere has and continues to inform how life itself is understood. Tracing the historical roots of the miniature modeling of regenerative life systems and ecologies, historian of science Sabine Höhler encapsulates the varied technoscientific motives and consequences of experimenting with self-contained ecospheres and how they relate to the concept of life on Earth.
As environments increasingly become computational so does computation become environmental. Tech-driven practices of environmental monitoring such as citizen-based air quality measurements and sensor networks generate material-political worlds through “creaturing data.” Jennifer Gabrys shows how the instrumentation of the planet with sensor devices produces specific forms of concretizations that have a life of their own and contour the earthly space anew.
Alternative projections of terrain and its technonatural reality are a powerful tool in fictionalizing the existent. In her work Spheres (2017), artist Rohini Devasher combines a concave curvature of sceneries with her drawings pulled from the history of geology, astronomy, and volcanology. With these, she envisions the space between landscape, recording technology, and their relationship to our planet.
Why does the world not come to a standstill? This question is positioned at the crest of the modern understanding of terrestrial cycles and spheres. In this article historian of science Pietro Daniel Omodeo unpacks the original, and thus, literal notion of the spheres—from their genuine context in ancient and early modern cosmology and metaphysical doctrine—and comments on the forfeiture of stability threatening today’s spheres.
Sociologist and epistemologist Bruno Latour interprets the disorienting situation we currently face along new lines of representation. Using the shift in cosmological perspective from the globe to the Earth brought about by the two concepts of Gaia and the Critical Zone, Latour reflects on the emergence of a new political subject: the “terrestrial.”
How did the current notion of “spheres” as an operational interface between living and inert matter come into being, and how did it go on to infiltrate thinking about the bio-techno-sphere, which today seems the best descriptive model for our own habitat? In this profound historical contextualization of the work and life of the eminent Russian naturalist Vladimir Vernadsky, historians of science Giulia Rispoli and Jacques Grinevald draw on the transformational role of concepts.