Forensic Architecture / Goldsmiths, University of London
Stockholm University
Goldsmiths, University of London
Critical Media Lab Basel FHNW/ NSCAD, Halifax
Goldsmiths, University of London
University of New Mexico
Tel Aviv University
University of Pennsylvania
Hubbub / Max Planck Intitute for Human Cogntive and Brain Science
School of the Art Institute of Chicago
Ernest G. Welch School of Art and Design / Georgia State University
University of California, San Diego / Strelka Institute for Media, Architecture and Design, Moscow
Wits Insitute for Social and Economic Research
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Berlin
University of California Santa Cruz
Goldsmiths, University of London
University of Western Australia
University of Washington, Seattle
University of California, San Diego
Penn State University
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin
Ca’ Foscari University, Venice / Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin
University of Leuven
Stockholm Resilience Centre and Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Yale University
University of Vienna
King’s College London
HKW
Center for GeoHumanities, Royal Holloway, University of London
The Wilderness Society
Munich Re
Goldsmiths, University of London
University of Southern California and Aarhus University Research on the Anthropocene (AURA)
Resource Strategy, University of Augsburg
University of Illinois at Chicago / School of the Art Institute of Chicago
Potsdam University
Oxford Internet Institute and Alan Turing Institute, London
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva
Enviornmental Humanites Laboratory / Royal Institute of Technology
Concordia University, Montréal
University of Arizona, Tucson
Stanford University / Center for International Security and Cooperation
American University in Cairo
Delft University of Technology
Goldsmiths, University of London
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
University of Lüneburg / Digital Culture Research Lab
University of Georgia
Duke University, North Carolina
University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette
SOAS, University of London
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
University of Chicago
Drexel University
Drexel University, Philadelphia
Rathenau Instituut, The Hague
University of California, Berkeley
University of California, Los Angeles
Barnard College, Columbia University
Sciences Po, Paris
Arizona State University / Global Biosocial Complexity Initiative
Open University, Milton Keynes
Birkbeck, University of London
Columbia University, New York
Stanford University Humanities Center
University of Edinburgh
National Center for Scientific Research, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin
Indiana University, Bloomington
Stanford University / Program in Science, Technology, and Society
Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto
University of Colorado Boulder
Goldsmiths, University of London
MIT
Cornell University
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
Stockholm Environment Institute
University of Alberta
Balsillie School of International Affairs, Waterloo, Canada
University of Potsdam
Speculative Design Project
University of Augsburg
King's College London
Technical University of Berlin / Cluster of Excellence “Unifying Systems of Catalysis”
University of Lancaster
Chicago Center for Contemporary Theory, University of Chicago
University of Kansas
Global Studies Institute, Geneva University
Australian National University
University of Pennsylvania
anexact office and Massachusetts Institute of Technology
University of Cape Town
MIT
Leuphana University Lüneburg
Fridtjof Nansen Institute, Lysaker
Feminist Research Institute, University of California, Davis
Rice University, Houston
School of the Art Institute of Chicago
University of Leicester / Anthropocene Working Group
School of Sustainability, Arizona State University
Sámi University of Applied Sciences, Kautokeino
How do Arctic infrastructures “live”? How does their extractive and appropriative logic do service to a rapidly changing world to come? Through both his own ethnographic studies and a documentary about workers at a hydroelectric power plant located on the far edge of Greenland's ice sheet, communication and cultural scholar Rafico Ruiz stresses the sets of relations created between the energetic imaginaries of large-scale technical infrastructures and global environmental change.
The Sámi, having lived in the Arctic regions of Scandinavia for millennia, have cultivated ritualized fishing and lake-caring techniques that maintain a reciprocal relationship with their aqueous environment. But over the years, these practices of relation have been threatened by the encroachment of industry, climate change, and even environmental restrictions. The social scientists Liv Østmo and John Law explain how this complicates the ontology of an entire region.
In this speculative provocation, researchers Francesco Sebregondi, Alexey Platonov, Inna Pokazanyeva, and Ildar Iakubov ask whether a full-scale, decentralized model of territorial development could be our best option to reckon with an open Arctic Ocean.
Based on experiences, stories, and representations of circumpolar regions, what follows examines (dis)orienting ways of technical knowing that align longitudinally. Jamie Allen's writings map the relations, tensions, and collusions between material and knowledge infrastructures and actual and modelled ecologies, and Merle Ibach prepares images to accompany these.
To put current polar geoengineering scenarios and their uncertain consequences into context, literary scholar Karen Pinkus reminds us of the adventure novel Topsy-Turvy by the prolific nineteenth-century novelist Jules Verne. As she tells the hyperbolic story of the sinister plan to tilt the Earth and extract the coal below a molten Arctic, it spurs us to consider how the figure of the Vernian engineer seems to be resurrected today in an attempt to do the opposite: to reglaciate the poles.
Activist and artist Subhankar Banerjee and engineer Lois Epstein depict the threatening environmental impact of an extractivist technosphere in key protected areas in Alaska’s Arctic. They report on the drastic effects the extraction operations of oil, gas, and coal have on wildlife populations, calling for multispecies justice in the face of the very recently renewed attempt to develop these last pristine environments.
What is remoteness? What kinds of narratives drive its representation, creating a violent topology of the distant and disconnected? Inspired by her experience of travelling to an abandoned “non-place” during a research trip to the Lena River Delta in northern Siberia, historian of science and technology Ksenia Tatarchenko reflects on filmic dramatizations of far-off and inaccessible places, capturing the fleeting role Soviet modernity had in establishing interconnection in isolation.
How do Arctic infrastructures “live”? How does their extractive and appropriative logic do service to a rapidly changing world to come? Through both his own ethnographic studies and a documentary about workers at a hydroelectric power plant located on the far edge of Greenland's ice sheet, communication and cultural scholar Rafico Ruiz stresses the sets of relations created between the energetic imaginaries of large-scale technical infrastructures and global environmental change.
The Sámi, having lived in the Arctic regions of Scandinavia for millennia, have cultivated ritualized fishing and lake-caring techniques that maintain a reciprocal relationship with their aqueous environment. But over the years, these practices of relation have been threatened by the encroachment of industry, climate change, and even environmental restrictions. The social scientists Liv Østmo and John Law explain how this complicates the ontology of an entire region.
In this speculative provocation, researchers Francesco Sebregondi, Alexey Platonov, Inna Pokazanyeva, and Ildar Iakubov ask whether a full-scale, decentralized model of territorial development could be our best option to reckon with an open Arctic Ocean.
Based on experiences, stories, and representations of circumpolar regions, what follows examines (dis)orienting ways of technical knowing that align longitudinally. Jamie Allen's writings map the relations, tensions, and collusions between material and knowledge infrastructures and actual and modelled ecologies, and Merle Ibach prepares images to accompany these.
To put current polar geoengineering scenarios and their uncertain consequences into context, literary scholar Karen Pinkus reminds us of the adventure novel Topsy-Turvy by the prolific nineteenth-century novelist Jules Verne. As she tells the hyperbolic story of the sinister plan to tilt the Earth and extract the coal below a molten Arctic, it spurs us to consider how the figure of the Vernian engineer seems to be resurrected today in an attempt to do the opposite: to reglaciate the poles.
Activist and artist Subhankar Banerjee and engineer Lois Epstein depict the threatening environmental impact of an extractivist technosphere in key protected areas in Alaska’s Arctic. They report on the drastic effects the extraction operations of oil, gas, and coal have on wildlife populations, calling for multispecies justice in the face of the very recently renewed attempt to develop these last pristine environments.
What is remoteness? What kinds of narratives drive its representation, creating a violent topology of the distant and disconnected? Inspired by her experience of travelling to an abandoned “non-place” during a research trip to the Lena River Delta in northern Siberia, historian of science and technology Ksenia Tatarchenko reflects on filmic dramatizations of far-off and inaccessible places, capturing the fleeting role Soviet modernity had in establishing interconnection in isolation.