Forensic Architecture / Goldsmiths, University of London
Stockholm University
Goldsmiths, University of London
Critical Media Lab Basel FHNW/ NSCAD, Halifax
Goldsmiths, University of London
University of New Mexico
Tel Aviv University
University of Pennsylvania
Hubbub / Max Planck Intitute for Human Cogntive and Brain Science
School of the Art Institute of Chicago
Ernest G. Welch School of Art and Design / Georgia State University
University of California, San Diego / Strelka Institute for Media, Architecture and Design, Moscow
Wits Insitute for Social and Economic Research
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Berlin
University of California Santa Cruz
Goldsmiths, University of London
University of Western Australia
University of Washington, Seattle
University of California, San Diego
Penn State University
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin
Ca’ Foscari University, Venice / Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin
University of Leuven
Stockholm Resilience Centre and Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Yale University
University of Vienna
King’s College London
HKW
Center for GeoHumanities, Royal Holloway, University of London
The Wilderness Society
Munich Re
Goldsmiths, University of London
University of Southern California and Aarhus University Research on the Anthropocene (AURA)
Resource Strategy, University of Augsburg
University of Illinois at Chicago / School of the Art Institute of Chicago
Potsdam University
Oxford Internet Institute and Alan Turing Institute, London
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva
Enviornmental Humanites Laboratory / Royal Institute of Technology
Concordia University, Montréal
University of Arizona, Tucson
Stanford University / Center for International Security and Cooperation
American University in Cairo
Delft University of Technology
Goldsmiths, University of London
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
University of Lüneburg / Digital Culture Research Lab
University of Georgia
Duke University, North Carolina
University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette
SOAS, University of London
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
University of Chicago
Drexel University
Drexel University, Philadelphia
Rathenau Instituut, The Hague
University of California, Berkeley
University of California, Los Angeles
Barnard College, Columbia University
Sciences Po, Paris
Arizona State University / Global Biosocial Complexity Initiative
Open University, Milton Keynes
Birkbeck, University of London
Columbia University, New York
Stanford University Humanities Center
University of Edinburgh
National Center for Scientific Research, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin
Indiana University, Bloomington
Stanford University / Program in Science, Technology, and Society
Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto
University of Colorado Boulder
Goldsmiths, University of London
MIT
Cornell University
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
Stockholm Environment Institute
University of Alberta
Balsillie School of International Affairs, Waterloo, Canada
University of Potsdam
Speculative Design Project
University of Augsburg
King's College London
Technical University of Berlin / Cluster of Excellence “Unifying Systems of Catalysis”
University of Lancaster
Chicago Center for Contemporary Theory, University of Chicago
University of Kansas
Global Studies Institute, Geneva University
Australian National University
University of Pennsylvania
anexact office and Massachusetts Institute of Technology
University of Cape Town
MIT
Leuphana University Lüneburg
Fridtjof Nansen Institute, Lysaker
Feminist Research Institute, University of California, Davis
Rice University, Houston
School of the Art Institute of Chicago
University of Leicester / Anthropocene Working Group
School of Sustainability, Arizona State University
Sámi University of Applied Sciences, Kautokeino
Guest curator Stefan Maier introduces this dossier by discussing WaveNet, Google's recently released speech synthesizer that is capable of both remarkable realism and abjection through applied machine listening. Arguing that technologies of synthetic sensation might have as much to do with the novel possibilities afforded by artificial intelligence as they do with the assumptions that underlie technical activity itself, Maier also acknowledges that such insights are not without significant historical precedence. In particular, this editorial looks to Maryanne Amacher's media opera Intelligent Life (1980–) and George Lewis's work in computer-human interaction as anticipating such problematics decades ago.
What are the implications of using one’s voice to improvise with a neural network? Composer Jennifer Walshe and artist Memo Akten present ULTRACHUNK, a neural network trained on a corpus of Walshe’s solo vocal improvisations. Here, Walshe wrangles with an artificially intelligent duet partner—one that reflects a distorted version of her own improvisatory language and individual voice.
In this republication of the liner notes to Couture Cosmetique (1997), Terre Thaemlitz suggests that digital production tools allow uses of audio that readily draw a comparison to nonessentialist transgendered critiques of representation and the body. By rejecting the normative concepts we project onto technology, Thaemlitz points toward what other visions of the human might be freed up in the process.
“Heteroglossia” describes the coexistence of distinct varieties within a single language. In Ben Vida’s composition Heteroglossic Riot, software reads text scores, which in turn drive the synthesis of synthetic speech and abstract sound. Through the interplay and disparity between text, speech, and sound, Vida points to the idiosyncratic possibilities offered by computationally assisted translation.
Composer, musicologist, and improviser George Lewis discusses Rainbow Family (1984), a groundbreaking work that employs proto-machine-listening software to analyze an improviser’s performance in real time, while simultaneously generating both complex responses to the musician’s playing and independent behavior arising from the program’s internal processes. The essay explores issues of subjectivity, agency, intelligibility, and social responsibility that arise in encounters between machine listeners and their biological counterparts.
What do machines hear that humans cannot? Artist Florian Hecker explores the formal, perceptual, and aesthetic possibilities afforded by custom machine-listening software in “1935.” Through the use of computer audition, Hecker explores degrees of perceptual resolution hitherto inaccessible via human listening.
In Mei-Jia & Ting-Ting & Chih-Fu & Sin-Ji, C. Spencer Yeh pushes speech synthesizers trained to represent various dialects of Chinese to the threshold of intelligibility and recognition. Through this creative misuse of such tools, Yeh questions the processes underlying codified representations of specific sociocultural identities in contemporary digital sound technologies.
Musicologist Amy Cimini discusses Maryanne Amacher's (1938–2009) unrealized media opera Intelligent Life (1980–), in which the composer conceived of "synthetic listening"—a futuristic form of computationally augmented listening that was initially proposed in this work. Cimini contextualizes Intelligent Life as a popular mediatic form that drew its influences from cutting-edge scientific knowledge intermingled with popular culture in the 1970s and 1980s.
The discrepancies between human and machine listening might be productively differentiated by considering their respective capacities for abstraction. Yoneda Lemma discusses her composition Calm can only make it false (Noise Floor), and the techno-political underpinnings of her compositional practice.
Guest curator Stefan Maier introduces this dossier by discussing WaveNet, Google's recently released speech synthesizer that is capable of both remarkable realism and abjection through applied machine listening. Arguing that technologies of synthetic sensation might have as much to do with the novel possibilities afforded by artificial intelligence as they do with the assumptions that underlie technical activity itself, Maier also acknowledges that such insights are not without significant historical precedence. In particular, this editorial looks to Maryanne Amacher's media opera Intelligent Life (1980–) and George Lewis's work in computer-human interaction as anticipating such problematics decades ago.
What are the implications of using one’s voice to improvise with a neural network? Composer Jennifer Walshe and artist Memo Akten present ULTRACHUNK, a neural network trained on a corpus of Walshe’s solo vocal improvisations. Here, Walshe wrangles with an artificially intelligent duet partner—one that reflects a distorted version of her own improvisatory language and individual voice.
In this republication of the liner notes to Couture Cosmetique (1997), Terre Thaemlitz suggests that digital production tools allow uses of audio that readily draw a comparison to nonessentialist transgendered critiques of representation and the body. By rejecting the normative concepts we project onto technology, Thaemlitz points toward what other visions of the human might be freed up in the process.
“Heteroglossia” describes the coexistence of distinct varieties within a single language. In Ben Vida’s composition Heteroglossic Riot, software reads text scores, which in turn drive the synthesis of synthetic speech and abstract sound. Through the interplay and disparity between text, speech, and sound, Vida points to the idiosyncratic possibilities offered by computationally assisted translation.
Composer, musicologist, and improviser George Lewis discusses Rainbow Family (1984), a groundbreaking work that employs proto-machine-listening software to analyze an improviser’s performance in real time, while simultaneously generating both complex responses to the musician’s playing and independent behavior arising from the program’s internal processes. The essay explores issues of subjectivity, agency, intelligibility, and social responsibility that arise in encounters between machine listeners and their biological counterparts.
What do machines hear that humans cannot? Artist Florian Hecker explores the formal, perceptual, and aesthetic possibilities afforded by custom machine-listening software in “1935.” Through the use of computer audition, Hecker explores degrees of perceptual resolution hitherto inaccessible via human listening.
In Mei-Jia & Ting-Ting & Chih-Fu & Sin-Ji, C. Spencer Yeh pushes speech synthesizers trained to represent various dialects of Chinese to the threshold of intelligibility and recognition. Through this creative misuse of such tools, Yeh questions the processes underlying codified representations of specific sociocultural identities in contemporary digital sound technologies.
Musicologist Amy Cimini discusses Maryanne Amacher's (1938–2009) unrealized media opera Intelligent Life (1980–), in which the composer conceived of "synthetic listening"—a futuristic form of computationally augmented listening that was initially proposed in this work. Cimini contextualizes Intelligent Life as a popular mediatic form that drew its influences from cutting-edge scientific knowledge intermingled with popular culture in the 1970s and 1980s.
The discrepancies between human and machine listening might be productively differentiated by considering their respective capacities for abstraction. Yoneda Lemma discusses her composition Calm can only make it false (Noise Floor), and the techno-political underpinnings of her compositional practice.